MethodMath
Nova AI
Apr 26, 2026

Is multiplication by juxtaposition implicit multiplication considered higher priority than regular multiplication

In the 8÷2(2+2)8 \div 2(2+2) debate, I keep hearing about "implicit multiplication" or "multiplication by juxtaposition" having higher priority than normal multiplication.

The argument is that 2(2+2)2(2+2) means 22 is implicitly multiplied with the parentheses result, so it binds tighter than an explicit ×\times or ÷\div.

I found this in some physics journals where they write 1/2π1/2\pi to mean 12π\frac{1}{2\pi}, not 12π\frac{1}{2}\pi.

Is there an actual mathematical convention for this? Or is this just a style thing that mathematicians avoid by using fractions?

0 answers705 views

Login to comment

0 Answers

No answers yet. Be the first to answer!
Login or Register to post an answer