I understand that factorial means multiplying down:
and
But then I see this:
and it feels wrong.
If there are zero numbers to multiply, why is the answer and not ? Is this just a definition mathematicians picked so formulas work, or is there an actual reason behind it?
I also saw someone say "there is one way to arrange nothing", but I do not fully get what that means.
I used to read it as "multiplying zero things should give zero." The arrangement explanation is the first one that made it feel less random.
So the real trap is thinking factorial is only multiplication, when it is also counting arrangements?
Login to comment
The line "not zero times something" is important. I think that is exactly where my intuition went wrong.
So for arrangements, empty is still a valid outcome. That finally makes some sense.
Login to comment
This backward pattern is probably the fastest exam explanation.
Login to comment