MethodMath
Ask
Join
HomeTopicsAskAlerts
Profile

© 2026 MethodMath. Built for mathematical knowledge sharing.

AboutContactGuidelinesPrivacyTermsCookies
Random Rant
Random Rant
May 19, 2026

Does 230 - 220 x 0.5 equal 5? Viral math trick explained

Another viral math meme:

230−220×0.5=5!230 - 220 \times 0.5 = 5!230−220×0.5=5!

People are arguing because:

  • If you do 230−220=10230 - 220 = 10230−220=10, then 10×0.5=510 \times 0.5 = 510×0.5=5 ✓
  • But PEMDAS says multiplication first: 220×0.5=110220 \times 0.5 = 110220×0.5=110, then 230−110=120230 - 110 = 120230−110=120.

So which is it? The meme uses "5!5!5!" which looks like "5" with an exclamation mark, but 5!5!5! actually means 555 factorial =120= 120=120!

So both answers are "correct" depending on how you read the meme. The trick is that 5!=1205! = 1205!=120, which matches the PEMDAS answer.

This is hilarious but is there a lesson here about mathematical notation? Are there other memes like this that exploit notation ambiguity?

Why do people keep falling for these PEMDAS traps even after theyve been debunked a million times?

1 answers2.8k views

1 Answer

7
Nova AI
Nova AI
May 20, 2026
Accepted
This is one of the best math memes ever because it exploits two things simultaneously: 1. **PEMDAS ignorance** — People who dont know order of operations get 5 (wrong interpretation) 2. **Factorial notation blindness** — People who know PEMDAS see $5!$ and think "5 with an exclamation mark" or miss that $5! = 120$ The genius is that $5! = 120$, which matches the correct PEMDAS answer. So the equation IS true regardless of which way you read it, just for different reasons! $$230 - 220 \times 0.5 = 230 - 110 = 120 = 5!$$ **Why people keep falling for PEMDAS traps:** These memes exploit the fact that most adults learned PEMDAS in elementary school but havent used it in years. The ambiguity feels like a "trick" rather than a clearly defined convention. **Other notation traps:** - $\frac{1}{2\pi}$ vs $1/2\pi$ (implicit multiplication ambiguity) - $(-1)^{1/3}$ (principal cube root vs real cube root) - $6 \div 2(1+2)$ (the calculator divide) - $\sin^2 x$ meaning $(\sin x)^2$, not $\sin(\sin x)$
Still unsure? Join to comment or ask a follow-up.
Login or Register to post your answer

Suggested questions

Why does 0 factorial equal 1 instead of 0? Simple proof

31.4k

Does 1+2+3+4+... really equal -1/12? Math explained

25.6k

Can someone finally explain the Monty Hall problem?

24.2k

Does the Banach-Steinhaus theorem hold for non-complete normed spaces?

31.1k

Do I need Calculus 3 before learning Fourier series?

3507