MethodMath
Ask
Join
HomeTopicsAskAlerts
Profile

© 2026 MethodMath. Built for mathematical knowledge sharing.

AboutContactGuidelinesPrivacyTermsCookies
Mike Johnson
Mike Johnson
Apr 30, 2026

Why is dividing by zero undefined instead of infinity?

In school they told us "you cant divide by zero" but they never explained WHY.

Like if you divide a number by a really small number you get a really big number right?

10.1=10\frac{1}{0.1} = 100.11​=10
10.01=100\frac{1}{0.01} = 1000.011​=100
10.001=1000\frac{1}{0.001} = 10000.0011​=1000

So as the denominator gets closer to 0, the result goes to infinity. So why isnt 10=∞\frac{1}{0} = \infty01​=∞?

I heard its because 10\frac{1}{0}01​ would imply 0×∞=10 \times \infty = 10×∞=1 which is nonsense. But also from the negative side, 1−0.001=−1000\frac{1}{-0.001} = -1000−0.0011​=−1000, so it approaches negative infinity.

Is there a way to make division by zero work with the "Riemann sphere" or "projectively extended real line"? Or is it fundamentally impossible?

2 answers2.4k views

2 Answers

2
Chen Wei
Chen Wei
May 1, 2026
Accepted
The fundamental reason: Division is defined as the inverse of multiplication. $a \div b = c$ means $b \times c = a$. So $1 \div 0 = c$ would mean $0 \times c = 1$. But $0 \times c = 0$ for ANY $c$. Theres no number $c$ satisfying $0 \times c = 1$. **What about the limit argument?** $$\lim_{x \to 0^+} \frac{1}{x} = +\infty, \quad \lim_{x \to 0^-} \frac{1}{x} = -\infty$$ The left and right limits dont agree, so even in the extended real line, the limit doesnt exist as a single value. **The Riemann sphere** does define $1/0 = \infty$ (a single point at infinity), but this requires adding a new element $\infty$ to the complex numbers and changing the definition of division. Its useful in complex analysis but not in standard arithmetic. **In short:** Division by zero is undefined because it would contradict the definition of division itself.
Still unsure? Join to comment or ask a follow-up.
0
Chen Wei
Chen Wei
May 1, 2026
There are two different ideas that often get mixed together. Division asks for a number that solves a multiplication equation. For example, $$\frac{12}{3}=4$$ because $$3\cdot 4=12.$$ So if we write $$\frac{1}{0}=x,$$ we are asking for $$0\cdot x=1.$$ But $0\cdot x=0$ for every ordinary number $x$. It can never equal 1. The limit idea is separate. It is true that $1/x$ becomes very large when $x$ is positive and very close to 0. But the expression at $x=0$ still has no value. A limit describes nearby behavior; it does not repair the missing operation.
Login or Register to post your answer

Suggested questions

Why does 0 factorial equal 1 instead of 0? Simple proof

31.4k

Does 1+2+3+4+... really equal -1/12? Math explained

25.6k

Can someone finally explain the Monty Hall problem?

24.2k

Does the Banach-Steinhaus theorem hold for non-complete normed spaces?

31.1k

Do I need Calculus 3 before learning Fourier series?

3500